header image

Home arrow Descriptives arrow Nonparametric Tests arrow Friedman
Friedman Print
Article Index
Friedman
post-hoc
Example

Example of a Friedman Test

In a poll 10 subjects rated 4 different paintings on a scale from 0 (don’t like it at all) to 5 (like it very much). The following table shows the data and ranks for all Subjects and paintings:

 


Painting 1
Rank
Painting 2
Rank
Paintin 3
Rank
Painting 4
Rank
1
0
1
5
4
1
2
4
3
2
3
2
4
3
2
1
5
4
3
1
1
4
3.5
3
2
4
3.5
4
4
4
2
1.5
2
1.5
3
3
5
2
1.5
2
1.5
4
4
3
3
6
0
1
3
2
5
3.5
5
3.5
7
3
2.5
1
1
3
2.5
4
4
8
5
3.5
3
2
1
1
5
3.5
9
1
1
5
4
2
2
4
3
10
2
2
4
4
0
1
3
3
Ti

19.5

26.5

20.5

33.5


1.95

2.65

2.05

3.35


We then get for the total sum of ranks:

 

We have tied ranks so the Chi-square value is:

 

whereas

 

 

so the Chi-square value is:

 

 

The critical 5% Chi-square for 3 degrees of freedom is 7.81. The Chi-square test does reject H0. There must be at least one painting which is differentially rated compared to at least one other painting.

 

For Conovers’ F value we get:

 

and the 5% critical F value with 3 and 27 degrees of freedom is 2.96. The F Test does reject H0. There must be at least one painting which is differentially rated compared to at least one other painting.

The critical Difference of the Mean Ranks  is:

 

 

 

The following table shows the differences of the mean ranks:

 


Painting 1
Painting 2
Painting 3
Painting 2
0.7
-
-
Painting 3
0.1
0.6
-
Painting 4
1.4 *
0.7
1.3 *

 

Post hoc paired comparisons reveal that painting four is rated differentially compared to paintings 1 and 3.

 

BrightStat Output of this example

 

This is a fictive example. 




Add BrightStat to Google Toolbar
Google
Login
Username

Password

Remember me
Password Reminder
No account yet? Create one

Thanks for supporting my work


Graph Export fixed

You may now export graphs again up to a size limit of 1 megapixels.

Advertisement